Privacy Coins – What are they, how do they work and why are they needed

Privacy Coins – What are they, how do they work and why are they needed

What are privacy coins?

Privacy coins implement functionality to hide your identity when making transactions. They also can keep your wallet anonymous and/or hide the balances of transactions as well.

What is the best privacy coin?

The best privacy coin is heavily debated. Monero is considered the best by many community members; however, Dash, Zcash, Hush, PIVX, and Verge are also in the running.

Why are privacy coins important?

Even if you aren’t illegally using your funds, you may not want your financial information and activity available to the public.

Privacy and anonymity oriented coins are becoming a pervasive and often contentious topic. As a result, many figures in the media and government have cast a distrustful eye on such protocols fearing a new medium for illicit and illegal activity. Meanwhile, freedom lovers applaud these new developments as an unprecedented evolution of not only technology but stateless financial freedom.

A solid argument I came across in favour of privacy was from the Zerocash white paper which stated:

“Privacy guarantees are designed to benefit legitimate users who do not want their financial details made public. There is a concern, as always, that decentralized anonymous payments will facilitate the laundering of ill-gotten funds by criminal users….however [Privacy coins] barely affects the status quo for criminal users, who already have strong incentives to hide their activity, while it provides notable benefits to legitimate users.”

Why do we need privacy?

Bitcoin utilizes cryptography to disguise identities and has a transparent public ledger. On one hand, this is an amazing construct but we need to consider the implications. Public wallets are viewable by anyone and include not only the balance of the wallet but also how much money has been received and paid out (including the public wallet addresses of senders and receivers).

Sure, this might be great for a non-profit or other publicly transparent entity…but do we really want anyone and everyone to see what we have and who we send to?

Businesses may have trade secrets or a list of clients and suppliers they want hidden. As a user, a safety concern arises as hackers could easily find and target large holders.

Introducing privacy coins.

These coins are meant to help give users a degree of anonymity in a robust and decentralized manner.

This guide highlights the technology, teams, and purpose between privacy coins including Monero, Zcash, Dash, Verge, PIVX, and Hush.

While there are other coins tackling these same use cases, we have opted to narrow down to the most popular coins based on the technology, market capitalization, adoption, and brand awareness.

Monero

 

Originally launched in April 2014 as BitMonero, Monero (symbol XMR), means money in Esperanto. Monero is a fork of Bytecoin and is a secure private untraceable currency.

A brief history from their website shares how we got to the current team: “The founder, thankful_for_today, proposed some controversial changes that the community disagreed with. A fallout ensued, and the Monero Core Team forked the project with the community following this new Core Team. This Core Team has provided oversight since.”

Monero leverages the CryptoNote technology as well as Ring Signatures, Ring Confidential Transactions and Stealth Addresses.

What is CryptoNote?

CryptoNote is an open-sourced protocol that allows for increased privacy in cryptocurrency transactions. Most traditional cryptocurrencies use unchanging signatures to verify transfers, while CryptoNote uses ring signature.

Ring Signatures: Cloaking the Sender

Ring Signatures are a type digital signature in which a group of signers is brought together to sign a transaction forming a ring. This is similar to a joint bank account but with the actual signer being unknown.

The actual sender generates a one-time spend key and the recipient is the only party that can detect and spend the funds based on that key. Since all outputs are unlinkable, the privacy of the recipient is ensured.

How double spending is prevented

If the outputs of the sender are prevented from being seen, what would prevent the outputs from being spent twice? Also, how might one verify a transaction occurred? Well, time to meet key images.

A key image is a cryptographic key derived from an output being spent that is made part of every ring signature transaction. There can exist only one key image for each output on the blockchain.

Based on its cryptographic properties it’s not possible to determine which output created which key image. A list of previously generated key images is maintained in blockchain allowing miners to verify that outputs weren’t spent twice.

Ultimately key images allow outputs to be authenticated without connecting it to the wallet address.

Ring Confidential Transactions (RCT): Masking Amounts of Funds

As of January 2017 Ring Confidential Transactions were activated optionally within the protocol. Now, it is a mandatory part of the protocol as of September 2017.

Prior to RingCT, transactions had to be split into multiple amounts. (E.g. If you sent 10 monero, it would be chunked into amounts like 2, 1.5, 3 and 3.5) The downside is that the amounts could still be seen regardless of being broken up.

Today with RingCT newly created monero first resides in outputs that have visible amounts. However, when the new monero is transferred for the first time, RingCT masked amounts are generated.

For example, if John has 12 Monero and sends 2 to Bill, John will send 12 and receive 10 back (the 12 – 2 for Bill) as “change”. To prove that Monero has not been fraudulently fabricated in the transaction, the sum of the transaction inputs must equal the sum of outputs

Due to cryptographic properties of RingCT, John is required to commit to the amount of the output revealing just enough information for the network (miners) to confirm the transaction while not publicly disclosing the total amount she is spending.

Although commits look like random numbers, miners can confirm the amount being sent is the same as a number of funds available.

Stealth Addresses: Hiding the receiver

In every transaction, a stealth address (aka a one-time public key) is automatically generated for the transaction to indicate who can spend funds in a later transaction.

An outside observer cannot tell if funds are moving from one to another or link wallet addresses together.

The funds going to the receiver are not connected with their wallet, however, the one-time key (stealth address) can be validated by a 3rd party to prove the transaction occurred.

The receiver can find the output destined for them by scanning the blockchain with their wallets private view key. Once the output is detected and retrieved by the wallet, the receiver would be able to calculate a one-time private key that corresponds to the sender’s one-time public key.

The receiver could then spend the relevant output with their wallets spend key. This whole process all occurs without having the receivers wallet publicly linked to any transaction.

Needless to say, Monero is a force to be reckoned with not only with the solidarity of the community and developers but a pretty unique technology that tackles a lot of previously unsolved problems with other cryptocurrencies.

Dash

Dash (formerly known as Darkcoin and XCoin) is an open source peer-to-peer cryptocurrency originally forked from Bitcoin. Dash offers the same features as Bitcoin but has improved capabilities, including instant and private transactions.

Originally founded in January of 2014, Dash uses a two-tier architecture to power its network. The first tier consists of miners who secure the network and write transactions to the blockchain. The second tier consists of masternodes who handle the instant and private transaction sending and decentralized governance.

The main features of Dash include:

  • InstantSend – Immediate transactions with ability to handle large volumes
  • PrivateSend – A coin mixing service based on a decentralized CoinJoin implementation
  • Decentralized Governance by Blockchain (DGBB) – A mechanism for management of future funding and development through a self-governing community

InstantSend

Originally called InstantX and rebranded in June 2016 as InstantSend, this component facilitates near-instant transactions. Using this system, inputs can be locked to specific transactions and verified by the masternode network. In addition, it could potentially compete with Bitcoin and even Visa’s throughput with capabilities 500-1000 transaction per second.

PrivateSend

PrivateSend is decentralized coin-mixing service based on CoinJoin. This includes using masternodes in place of a single gateway, chaining by mixing with multiple masternodes, restricting the mixing to only accept certain denominations (e.g.: 0.01 DASH, 0.1 DASH, 1 DASH, and 10 DASH, etc.)

The main problem with CoinJoin is that users cannot negotiate transactions within the Bitcoin protocol forcing users to send their funds outside of the Bitcoin network to centralized services.

Dash aimed to create a decentralized CoinJoin construct within the protocol through full nodes who handle the mixing service internally between randomly selected nodes.

One critique of this approach is a Sybil attack where malicious parties create thousands of nodes to control a majority % of the network. This could lead to centralized control of user transactions ultimately deanonymizing them.

To remedy this, Dash created a collateralized node approach called Masternodes requiring 1000 Dash to run a Masternode. In addition. Masternodes are rewarded (similar to miners) for providing the mixing service honestly.

Decentralized Governance (DGBB)

Dash is a decentralized autonomous organization powered by a Sybil proof decentralized governance and funding system called Decentralized Governance by Blockchain (DGBB). Also referred to as the “treasury system”, the DGBB is a consensus mechanism on network development and funding of the Dash ecosystem. 10% of block rewards go to this treasury.

In addition, each masternode operator receives one vote. MNs vote on proposals submitted through dash.org forums and other community-driven websites like DashCentral. Proposal submitters typically provide multiple drafts and lobby for community support before sharing their project with the network for a vote. After the proposal is accepted, the network automatically pays out the funds in the next super block, which occurs monthly.

Dash has evolved greatly since its inception as Darkcoin and ultimately has proven to be a player by surviving and building upon the original code and project. In addition, by tackling problems that were unsolved by Bitcoin it has truly added functionality and reduced friction to the ecosystem as a whole.

ZCash

ZeroCoin – The Catalyst for ZCash

Before we jump into Zcash, it’s important to understand the protocol that preceded it.

Zerocoin is a cryptographic currency protocol created by Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, and Aviel D. Rubin in 2013. The next iteration was called Zerocash which was an improvement on the protocol which included the original team and Eran Tromer, and Madars Virza in 2014.

Bitcoin operates in a transparent manner by broadcasting and verifying payment transactions on a public ledger. Zerocash differs in how these payment transactions are assembled and then verified, ultimately providing increased anonymity to the user.

It’s interesting to note that all of the scientists behind Zerocash are Zcash team members indicating this protocol will have support from the founders. In addition, they have such noteworthy investors as Roger Ver and Erik Voorhees.

ZCash – The First Widespread Application of Zerocash

Zcash is an implementation of the Zerocash protocol based on zk-SNARKs (Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge). ZEC is the currency code for the Zcash currency and ⓩ is the currency symbol.

A zero-knowledge protocol is a way for one party to prove to a different party that a given statement is true, without conveying anything other than the statement is indeed true.

 

Zcash spend types

Funds in Zcash are either transparent (public) or shielded. The transparent value is the same as Bitcoin and has the same privacy features. Shielded value leverages notes which detail the amount and include a paying key which is part of the payment address and is a destination to which notes can be sent. This is connected with a private key that can spend notes sent to the address also called a spending key

A payment address includes two public keys: a paying key associated with the notes sent to the address and a transmission key which operates similarly to viewing key, only accessible by the holder of the related private key.

In short, a sender can send encrypted output notes on the blockchain to a receiver who uses the transmission (viewing) key to scan the blockchain for notes addressed to them and then decrypt those notes.

The core privacy characteristics of Zcash is when a note is spent, the spender proves a commitment for it had been revealed, without revealing which one. This means a spent note cannot be connected to the transaction in which it was created.

Zcash is one of those interesting projects that, although forked from Bitcoin, has incorporated and innovated some truly original technology which is not always the case with various “coins” hitting the market. With such legendary investors as Erik Voorhees and even interest from JP Morgan, Zcash is another up and coming powerhouse.

Hush

Hush is a private implementation of the Zerocash protocol forked from Zcash.

Hush has a trusted setup following the same methodology as the Zcash team which included a ceremonial burning of private keys which could access the network.

What’s the difference between Hush and ZCash?

As stated on the Hush bitcointalk announcement: “The on-chain assets that ZcashCo is working on to Zcash proper are not as powerful as counterparty assets, and they are not looking at directly adding the EVM to Zcash. The Zclassic and Zen development teams are currently in flux and while some of the promised features of ZEN are similar to those for HUSH, we believe we have and will continue to have a better track record of sipping releases.”

Hush and its team while sharing almost exact similarities with Zcash, have made an effort to fill in gaps that aren’t going to be filled for sure as well as making an inclusive and fair distribution of tokens for early birds who may have missed the Zcash boat early on. As a result, Hush is one to keep on the radar for the future.

PIVX

Private Instant Verified Transaction aka PIVX, is a decentralized open-source privacy cryptocurrency launched on February 1, 2016, as Darknet (DNET) before it was professionally re-branded to PIVX.  PIVX runs on the Blackcoin PoS 2.0 protocol and is based on a Bitcoin fork (same as Dash).

The main difference between PIVX and Dash is that PIVX is 100% Proof of Stake. This means  PIVX doesn’t rely on miners, instead of rewarding holders through a Proof of Stake (POS) mechanism. This shift also puts more power in the hands of the Masternodes who verify transactions instead of the miners.

Another difference is the seesaw reward mechanism which PIVX uses to distribute block rewards. 90% of rewards go to Masternodes and Proof of stake nodes with 10% going to community projects.

Similar to HUSH, PIVX also provides a fresh and ground floor opportunities for new people who felt that they may have missed the Dash train. Leveraging the proven tech of Dash with their own tweaks and community support makes PIVX a solid player in the privacy space.

Verge

Verge is a privacy cryptocurrency focused on communication through protocols like I2p and Tor which have supported integrations with the platform with Android support as well.

Verge has 5 Proof-of-Work algorithms that run on its blockchain including Scrypt, X17, Lyra2rev2, myr-groestl and blake2s. Each algorithm has a 30-second block target block time. The difficulty is influenced only by the algorithms hash rate. This allows improved security and protection against 51% attacks.

Other noteworthy features include P2P transaction support for Telegram and Discord which is currently in development and slated to be released soon. With Telegram clocking 100 million users and Discord with 40, there is quite an audience they will be in front of.

Finally, there is future development to incorporate Rootstock (RSK): “RSK, is a two-way pegged sidechain that grafts smart contract functionality onto the Verge network. It also introduces an off-chain protocol for near-instant payments. RSK is an independent blockchain that does not have its own token, it instead relies on existing tokens (such as Verge). RSK is able to do this by pegging (or matching) its smart token to Verge, so that the value of an RSK token is exactly that of a Verge token. Users have the capabilities to freely move their tokens back and forth between the two chains.”

While being more of an integrator of various pre-existing constructs such as I2p and Tor as well as the Discord/Telegram and Rootstock incorporations tell me that Verge wants their stuff to work and work well. With a focus on communications and channels already used by their target market, this privacy token is going to keep the industry on its toes by offering a quality product.

Takeaways

We hope you enjoyed this journey into Crypto. As you can see, the world of privacy cryptocurrencies is very complex with a variety of underlying technology and use cases.

Keep in mind that although many Coins share similar approaches and characteristics, they are not by any means “the same”. Even forks and variations to the same code bases can be cloned, tweaked and modified to a developer’s heart’s content creating vastly different implementations from the original.

These tweaks and mods are often based on not just new ideas of how to do things but new scaling approaches that might not work on the original network the project was derived from. (As was the case with Zcash and Dash relative to Bitcoin)

This is why each coin especially the ones mentioned above are continuously innovating and finding ways to maintain their competitive edge and unique value propositions. Only time will tell who is going to win this battle.

This article was originally published on Coincentral.

Author:

Aaron Mangal

Aaron has spent 10+ years in different start-up, business environments wearing hats in marketing, sales, management and operations. This prompted a deeper professional interest in the Bitcoin and Blockchain space which he had been dabbling in since 2014 as a miner and trader. Aaron now writes about Blockchain Technologies and does content marketing and business development for CoinStructive, a Bitcoin and Blockchain consulting firm.

 

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

 

Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)

 

Why Is Cryptocurrency Associated with Criminal Activity?

Why Is Cryptocurrency Associated with Criminal Activity?

Despite countless examples to the contrary, many people still toss cryptocurrency and criminal activity into the same bucket. But is this born out of ignorance or fact? We all fear the unknown. Perhaps it’s partially because, to the layman, digital currencies suddenly seem to be taking over.

Despite proving that cryptocurrency is about more than evading taxes, why do so many people still make the link between Bitcoin and nefarious deeds?

The Silk Road

If The Silk Road conjures up images of an ancient trade route between the East and West, and intrepid merchants thirsty for adventure, your version needs a little updating. Many people think of cryptocurrency and criminal activity because of The Silk Road website that used Bitcoin as its main currency.

It was an online marketplace for buying and selling drugs, weapons, and all things illicit on the dark web. Alongside giving rise to Bitcoin’s popularity, The Silk Road also tainted its reputation. Just like that toxic ex-lover you knew was bad for you, Bitcoin and The Silk Road just couldn’t be separated.

When Bitcoin reached parity with the dollar in 2011, buying and selling on The Silk Road was easy. It was also relatively anonymous–until the Feds began to investigate, find, and prosecute criminals and the website was shut down. But the stain on Bitcoin’s reputation lived on.

Cybercrime

A depiction of cybercriminal in a black hoodie with a tech-related backdrop.

Are cryptocurrencies and cybercrime synonymous?

Another reason people associate cryptocurrency and criminal activity is cybercrime. Unfortunately, being natively digital, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin fast became cybercriminals’ payment method of choice when using Ransomware. Since there’s no physical location connected to a cryptocurrency wallet, the perpetrators are much harder to trace.

Think of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency wallets as the cyber equivalent of an offshore account in the Cayman Islands. Drug dealers and crooks have used those for many years, now they’re just on the net.

However, since Bitcoin isn’t as anonymous as people thought, the kicker comes when the criminals try to convert their Bitcoin into dollars.

There are workarounds of course, such as a crypto to crypto exchanges that don’t ask users to create an account. In the US, protocols of KYC and AML are effectively preventing this kind of transaction. But many other countries still allow for them to be anonymous.

Cryptojacking is another problem looming ever larger in the cybersecurity space. While the hackers’ intent is to use computational power to mine cryptocurrency, not to overtly steal funds, they’re still stealing electricity and making devices run slower. All while accumulating millions of dollars’ worth of coins like Monero.

Most companies are a step ahead of the crypto jackers by now. They’re using effective patch management and improving employee cyber hygiene. Individuals can also protect themselves by installing adblockers and antivirus programs. But that doesn’t stop ingenious hackers who’re getting more creative every day, whether they use a free WordPress design or a malicious advert.

It does nothing to help separate the association of cryptocurrency and criminal activity either.

Anonymity

There’s no one who wants to remain as anonymous as a gangster or mafia thug. After all, most upstanding citizens have no qualms about their data. Unless it’s being used without their knowledge by companies like Facebook, it’s generally not essential to them that their transactions are kept covert.

The fact that some cryptocurrencies are anonymous gives rise to the public’s association of cryptocurrency and criminal activity. That a person’s details are replaced by account keys is certainly an enabler of many types of criminal activity. This includes tax evasion, buying illegal goods, money laundering, and even capital flight.

Quite a few people so far have used cryptocurrency to send large sums of money outside of their country. On top of that, the sources of the amounts may be unknown, unlike a bank that requires customers to justify the source of funds.

Yet, many argue that anonymity and privacy are a person’s right. And actually, Bitcoin came about as a response to the 2008 financial crisis. That was arguably one of the darkest pits of criminal activity ever witnessed.

Thanks to the widespread corruption of centralized agencies and governments, Bitcoin was born. And early developers of cryptocurrency identified as cypherpunks, argue that privacy is necessary for an open society in the electronic age.

Ironically, fiat currencies are much more suitable for money laundering than crypto, with the US dollarbeing the criminal denomination of choice. It’s actually far easier to not leave any trail with dollar bills than it is by using cryptocurrency since your digital footprint is almost always trackable.

Scams

Howey Coins was a fake ICO used by SEC to teach investors a lesson. This image is a screenshot of a Howey Coins pre-ICO token sale.

Howey Coin, an SEC “scam” to help teach investors a lesson about the dangers of ICO fraud.

Rather than hearing about all the successful ICOs, headlines pay far more attention to cryptocurrency scams. The wider public not involved in the cryptocurrency sphere may not hear about charitable donations being made in Bitcoin, or Ethereum building a decentralized world. But they do hear that 10 per cent of all ICO funds were stolen in 2017. Or that over 80 per cent of all ICOs are scams.

ICO scams are such a big problem that the SEC issued one to demonstrate how easy these scams are to fall for and to educate investors. With regulators starting to pay more attention and getting stricter on ICOs, the number of scams should start to diminish. And with companies like Google and Facebook banning ICO advertising and celebrities starting to endorse less ICOs (including “Shitcoin Shiller” John McAfee), more investors may be saved.

But ICO scams are yet another trigger for the cryptocurrency and criminal activity association. And the scammers always find a way to get around the ad bans, using social media and offering to send Ether back to people who send it to them first.

You have to admit, it’s hard to have sympathy for the type of person who would fall for a scam this glaringly obvious, yet there have been plenty of unfortunate victims. This scam has caused many high-profile names in crypto to include “not giving away ETH” after their name. Just check out Vitalik’s Twitter.

A screenshot of Vitalik Buterin's Twitter profile, stating that he is not giving way ETH.

Vitalik “Not giving Away ETH” Buterin

Cryptocurrency and Criminal Activity–the Association Lives On

The lack of regulation thus far has caused the criminal association to reach fever pitch, with the crypto space often referred to as the Wild West. However, regulation is starting to appear in various forms around the world this year.

In the US, the SEC is calling on all exchanges to register as securities exchanges. Around the world, other countries are drawing up legal frameworks to protect investors without restricting innovation.

We’ll always associate large amounts of cash with criminals. But as people become more knowledgeable about cryptocurrency, hopefully, the knee-jerk reaction about its criminality will begin to dissipate. And already, there seems to be a change in the air.

That said, it’s inevitable that criminals will use cryptocurrencies for nefarious deeds, as long as there are criminals in our world. In the same way that they will continue to rob banks, kill each other, and start wars. We don’t associate major banks with criminal activity even after 2008, so maybe it’s time to let cryptocurrencies off the hook.

This article has been originally published on Coincentral.

Author:

Christina Comben

Christina is a B2B writer and MBA, specializing in fintech, cybersecurity, the blockchain, and other geeky areas.

 

 

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

 

Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)

Dark Web: US Authorities Arrest 35 Individuals Engaged in Illicit Cryptocurrency Activities

Dark Web: US Authorities Arrest 35 Individuals Engaged in Illicit Cryptocurrency Activities

Law enforcement agencies in the U.S. struck Dark Web vendors and confiscated illegal items worth over $23.6 million, according to a U.S. Department of Justice report dated June 26, 2018. The items included narcotics, 2,000 bitcoins, mining devices, $3.6 million in cash and gold, and over 100 weapons, including a grenade launcher.

Nationwide raids by officers also led to the seizure of five cars, apparently used in criminal activity and bought with proceeds from illegal business. The 35 suspects arrested were between the ages of 21 and 34 years.

The investigation, which was on for more than a year, spanned the states of New York, California, Maryland, Vermont, and Ohio. It also involved the Postal Inspection Service, Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Secret Service, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), making it one of the biggest joint law enforcement efforts in the nation’s history.

U.S. authorities carry out major offensive against Dark Web crime suspects

U.S. authorities carry out raids against a Dark Web crime syndicate (Image Credit: Wikimedia)

Dark Web, Drugs, Bitcoins and Grenade Launchers

The success of the campaign was heavily dependent on Special Agents from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) who posed as bitcoin traders and money launderers in underground marketplaces. The technique enabled officers to obtain personal information from suppliers of illegal items, resulting in 90 investigations. Scrutinized marketplaces included The Silk Road, AlphaBay, Hansa Market, and Dream.

In one residence, marijuana, cocaine, and LSD were discovered in addition to heat sealing equipment, reagents, precursor powders, liquids, and a lab. The authorities also stumbled upon shipping boxes bearing destination addresses and packed with narcotics-filled hair brushes.

According to Special Agent James J. Hunt, cyber drug trafficking has allowed vendors to have substantial reach, exacerbating the drug-related deaths scourge that the country is currently experiencing.

Just two days ago, European authorities made a similar drug bust involving Dark Web sellers seizing $5.2 million in cryptocurrencies, 800,000 LSD blotters, close to $4 million in fiat, and 10 vehicles. The seizures are a major offensive by authorities in both continents against dealers leveraging the assumed combined anonymity of the Dark Web and cryptocurrencies.

This article has been originally published on CoinCentral.

Author:

Elizabeth Gail

Elizabeth Gail is crypto-enthusiast and a blogger. Her specialties include cryptocurrency news and analysis. When not writing about crypto, she’s out taking part in humanitarian endeavors across the world. You can reach out and engage with her on Twitter and Google Plus.

 

 

 

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

 

Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)

Russia Potentially Helped Venezuela Launch Petro to Dodge U.S. Sanctions

Russia Potentially Helped Venezuela Launch Petro to Dodge U.S. Sanctions

On March 19, 2018 Donald Trump issued a executive order banning Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s oil-backed cryptocurrency, the petro. In case you missed it, Donald Trump’s formal statement notes, “in light of recent actions taken by the Maduro regime to attempt to circumvent U.S. sanctions by issuing a digital currency in a process that Venezuela’s democratically elected National Assembly has denounced as unlawful, hereby order as follows: Section 1.  (a) All transactions related to, provision of financing for, and other dealings in, by a United States person or within the United States, any digital currency, digital coin, or digital token, that was issued by, for, or on behalf of the Government of Venezuela on or after January 9, 2018, are prohibited as of the effective date of this order. (b)  The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.” While this executive order was primarily directed at Venezuela, new information from TIME reveals that the petro may actually have been a collaboration between Venezuela and Russia to circumvent U.S. sanctions. According to TIME’s source, an executive at a Russian state bank who deals with cryptocurrencies, “senior advisers to the Kremlin have overseen the effort in Venezuela, and President Vladimir Putin signed off on it last year.” Additionally, the report claims that Russian billionaires Dennis Druzhkov and Fyodor Bogorodsky helped advise Maduro while building the petro. If the collaboration between Russia and Venezuela is proven true, it wouldn’t exactly be much of a surprise. The Russian sentiment that the U.S. dollar has too much power on the global economy is not new by any means. Just last month, Andrei Kostin, the head of Russia’s second-largest bank, advocated and pushed for Russia’s promotion of other currencies in international trade to limit the impact the U.S. Dollar has on the global financial system.

The Venezuelan Sandbox Hypothesis

As TIME suggests, the Russians may have used Venezuela as an experiment to test a decentralized currency without the risk of bringing down their ruble. Venezuela, whose economy has been in shambles for some months now, seems like the perfect candidate. The U.S. sanctions have played a large role in destabilizing the Venezuelan bolivar, and also pushed the Maduro regime more dependent on Russia for investments and loans to keep Venezuela (barely) above water.

Final Thoughts

The Kremlin has not responded to questions regarding the petro, and the Finance Ministry in Moscow insisted that Russia’s financial authorities played no part in the petro’s creation. While there isn’t any substantive proof or formal statement that confirms the reality of Russia’s involvement in the Petro, or their objectives if they were involved, these discoveries by TIME will play an interesting role in the development of the “blockchain as a tool for international economic dominance” narrative.
This article published on Coincentral Author:
Alex is the Editor-in-Chief of CoinCentral. Alex also advises blockchain startups, enterprise organizations, and ICOs on content strategy, marketing, and business development.

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

  Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)
Europol Busts Cybercrime King Pin Responsible for Laundering €1bln with Cryptocurrency

Europol Busts Cybercrime King Pin Responsible for Laundering €1bln with Cryptocurrency

€1bln in Stolen Bank Funds “Hidden” with Crypto

A recent cybercrime bust has given civil authorities more fodder to feed the argument that popular cryptocurrencies attract criminal activity and money laundering.

Earlier this week, Europol, the European Union’s leading law enforcement agency, recently apprehended the ringleader of the hacking group responsible for stealing more than €1bln from over 100 financial institutions worldwide.  According to Europol’s press release, the cybercriminals nabbed the funds from banks and financial institutions in more than 40 countries, laundering their loot with cryptocurrencies to hide it from local and international authorities.

The cybercrime organization, known as the Carbanak gang, has been conducting remote, malware-driven heists since 2013. Derived from a precursor program called Anunak, a malware known as Carbanak became the gang’s primary weapon from 2014-2016, hence their team’s moniker.  Using company emails as their vector of attack, the team would send out seemingly legitimate emails to bank employees that contained phishing malware.  If an employee clicked on the email’s malicious links, the criminals were granted access to the financial institution itself or, in some cases, its ATM networks.

From 2016 on, the team utilized a more sophisticated malware known as Cobalt that allowed them to steal as much as €10mln per hack.  As with Carbanak, Cobalt allowed the criminals to breach into a bank’s central server or network through phishing attacks, giving them complete control and access over a variety of functions.  This allowed the gang to steal funds by “‘voluntarily’ [spitting] out” money at predesignated ATMs, directly wiring funds into criminal accounts, or modifying databases to inflate customer accounts so money mules could collect the difference.

After the thefts, the team converted the funds into cryptocurrencies using prepaid cards.  Once in their wallets, they used the digital funds to purchase high-end cars, houses, and other luxury items.  The press release did not specify which cryptocurrencies were used in the laundering.

A Concerted International Policing Effort

Europol’s report stressed that the international policing community’s united effort was responsible for the ring leader’s arrest.  Such cooperation, the post conveys, was necessary given the global scale of the operation.

“International police cooperation coordinated by Europol and the Joint Cybercrime Action Taskforce was central in bringing the perpetrators to justice, with the mastermind, coders, mule networks, money launderers and victims all located in different geographical locations around the world,” the press release reads.

The gang’s leader, whose identity remains undisclosed, was arrested in Alicante, Spain “after a complex investigation conducted by the Spanish National Police, with the support of Europol, the US FBI, the Romanian, Moldovan, Belarussian and Taiwanese authorities and private cybersecurity companies.”

Moreover, the release indicates that Europol and other investigation agencies couldn’t have succeeded had it not been for its cooperation with private sector entities, namely the European Banking Federation (EBF).  Wim Mijs, the CEO of the EBF, stated that “[this] is the first time that the EBF has actively cooperated with Europol on a specific investigation,” touting that the success of the bust “demonstrates the value of [this] partnership” for “effectively fighting digital cross-border crimes like [this] one.”

In regards to the arrest,  the head of Europol’s European Cybercrime Centre, Steven Wilson, chalks it up as a significant victory for the international cybersecurity community:

“This global operation is a significant success for international police cooperation against a top-level cybercriminal organisation. The arrest of the key figure in this crime group illustrates that cybercriminals can no longer hide behind perceived international anonymity. This is another example where the close cooperation between law enforcement agencies on a worldwide scale and trusted private sector partners is having a major impact on top-level cyber criminality.”

This article was published on CoinCentral.

Author:

Colin Harper

Colin is a freelance writer and crypto-enthusiast based in Nashville, TN.

 

 

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

 

Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrency? – A Modern Exploration of Money

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrency? – A Modern Exploration of Money

A number of leading businessmen and economists have questioned the need for cryptographic currencies over traditional fiat (paper) ones. Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency, was largely created as a response to and rose to popularity as a result of the 2008/2009 financial crisis. To understand why cryptocurrencies exist and what benefits they provide we first need to take a journey back in time to the origins of paper money.

Born in the East

Most people dig into their pockets on a daily basis, without thinking of how we came to use this most valuable of tools. Paper money is not a new phenomenon. We have been using it now for roughly a millennia. The earliest recorded uses were observed in China around the time of 1000 AD.

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies

The World’s First Paper-Printed Currency

The Chinese government very quickly recognized the benefits of using paper over minted coins. They were cheap to produce and easy to distribute. A whole new era of commerce was about to evolve.

But What is Money Exactly?

Most of us grow up believing that money = government printed paper. It may be difficult to see that, in fact, just about anything could be used as currency. Modern-day economists agree that sound money has the following 3 properties:

  1. Store of Value
  2. Unit of Account
  3. Medium of Exchange

Store of Value

Money has value if it has a limited supply. This is why we collect rare objects like art, wine, and gold jewellery. It also holds value if we perceive it to hold value. Currently, only the faith of governments backs most national currencies.

Unit of Account

Money requires some sort of accounting system (or ledger) to record the positive and negative balances when goods and services are exchanged. In a cash system, this works well since your money is debited when you are credited with a good or service. A digital system, however, needs to fairly debit and credit transactions, otherwise, the system breaks down.

Medium of Exchange

A good medium of exchange can be easily transferred between buyers and sellers and re-used for future transactions. Corn, for example, is not a good medium of exchange. It requires large amounts of storage, is difficult to handle, and decays quickly. Coins and paper money have traditionally worked quite well. They are small and easy to carry around.

Drawbacks With the Current System

The invention and mainstream adoption of paper currency by the Chinese was an innovative way to enable commerce. It did, however, bring with it a few major weaknesses:

The Middleman

To get your hands on this official paper wealth you need a central authority (government/bank) to issue it. This ultimately means that you as a business or consumer need to trust this authority. You completely depend on them to maintain a sound standard of money.

In our increasingly digital age, we are becoming a lot more reliant on third parties to facilitate trade. Some societies like Sweden, where cash is scarce, rely heavily on the middleman.

Inflation/Hyperinflation

The second particularly destructive problem that occurs is a sneaky little thing called Inflation. Inflation is a stealth tax placed by Governments on their citizens through the printing of additional currency. There is no supply limit in fiat currency systems. Central banks can theoretically print as much as they want.

When the supply in an economic system is dramatically increased, we see the prices for goods and services spiral out of control. We have seen the negative results of this hyperinflated money frequently around the world and through the ages since the Chinese introduced this possibility. Take for example this one hundred trillion dollar note issued in Zimbabwe around 2008/2009:

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies

A breakdown of any one of the properties of money we observed earlier results in a breakdown of that very thing being used as money.

The Everything Bubble

The world is drowning in debt and central banks all over are pushing their printing presses hard. We are approaching a potentially disastrous situation, now coined “the everything bubble”. Visual Capitalist provides an excellent infographic on the estimated money in existence.

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies

Courtesy of Visual Capitalist

History never lies and it very often repeats. Notable bitcoin developer Jimmy Song stated in a recent interview, that “Money is the base layer of civilization… When you debase money, you debase civilization”.

What Cryptocurrency Brings to the Table

Trustless Commerce

The fundamental issue that cryptocurrencies aim to solve is to reduce the reliance on trust to a middleman/third party. In a centralized system, the weak point is always at the centre. In a peer-to-peer system, if one peer goes down, others will be there to pick up the slack.

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies

A Visual Representation of Centralized vs Decentralized Systems – Courtesy of Adam Aladdin

When trust breaks down, who is going to hold the middleman accountable? Let’s take this Australian bank that was caught laundering money as an example. In such cases, another middleman, like a government agency often steps in to handle the situation. But can we trust another centralized organization to solve a problem which was created by a centralized organization in the first place?

Sound Money

Bitcoin holds very strongly to the properties of sound money.

  1. It is a store of value (with a limited supply)
  2. Blockchain technology introduces a securely distributed ledger as a unit of account
  3. It is an excellent medium of exchange. While physical cash is still easier in many local situations, Bitcoin can be sent to all corners of the globe within a matter of minutes.

This inverse Bitcoin US Dollar chart gives us a big picture view of how cryptocurrencies are measuring up against the paper. The Dollar has fallen dramatically since 2011:

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies

This is not a mistake. The world’s reserve currency has lost 99.97% of its value against Bitcoin in this period. The trend is clear, people all over the world are looking for a way to preserve their wealth.

Challenges

Of course, the cryptocurrency revolution comes with its own set of problems. A healthy level of scepticism is needed for any emerging technology. Scams, robbery and money laundering are still issues that affect the public at large. Scalability, large-scale adoption, and ease of use are some of the challenges developers face as they venture into uncharted territory.

Do We Really Need Cryptocurrencies?

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are trying to solve some fundamental issues of the now 1000-year-old fiat based economy. We are in the early stages of this industry and there are probably more questions out there than answers.

Despite advances in technology, it is estimated that 1.7 billion people remain unbanked. How do we include them? Is there a better way to facilitate global trade? Can we create sound community-based money? Do we really need cryptocurrencies? Well, when the next financial crisis hits, the ultimate question we may just have to ask ourselves is, can we really do without them?

This article first appeared on CoinCentral.com

Author:

Ryan Smith

Ryan is a web developer, writer, and cryptocurrency trader who hails from sunny South Africa. He eats, breathes and lives crypto. When not meticulously looking over charts he can be found planning his next road trip or running around a 5-a-side soccer field.

“Top Misconceptions of Cryptocurrency as a Payment System”

Which can be read on Amazon Kindle Unlimited for Free  You can find more interesting articles by visiting us on one of the following platforms: AML Knowledge Centre (LinkedIn) or Anti-Bribery and Compliance at the Front-Lines (LinkedIn)

Picture: Lukasz Stefanski – Shutterstock